Virteche
Guideschevron_rightStorage

Storage · 6 min read · Updated

Storage Box vs Object Storage (S3)

Both are places to put backups, and the same tools can often write to either. The difference is in how you reach them and how you pay: a storage box is a disk you log into over SSH at a flat price; object storage is an HTTP API that charges for what you store and, usually, for what you take back out.

Side by Side

Storage boxObject storage
How you reach itSSH: SFTP, SCP, rsync, BorgAn HTTP API (S3 and compatibles)
What it looks likeA folder tree with a fixed sizeBuckets of objects, effectively unlimited
PriceFlat per month for the sizePer GB stored, plus downloads and requests on most providers
Best toolsrsync, Borg, restic, rclone, any SFTP clientrestic, rclone, Kopia, cloud-native backup tools
ExtrasSimple and predictableVersioning, lifecycle rules, object lock, multi-region
RestoresNo per-download feeEgress fees can make large restores expensive

When a Storage Box Is the Better Fit

When your tools already speak SSH — rsync jobs, Borg, a server's existing backup script — and you would rather know the bill in advance. It is also the simpler thing to reason about: a size, a folder tree, and a login. Restoring a whole server costs nothing extra, which matters because the day you restore everything is the day you least want a surprise invoice.

When Object Storage Is the Better Fit

When the data grows without a ceiling you can predict, when you need features a filesystem does not have — object versioning, immutability locks, lifecycle rules that move old data to colder tiers — or when an application needs to serve files directly over HTTP.

Ours: Object Storage at a Storage-Box Price

Our object storage is priced like a storage box: a flat monthly price for 1, 2 or 5 TB, with monthly transfer (uploads and downloads together) equal to the plan size and no request or download fees. So the choice between our two comes down to your tools — SSH and SFTP for a storage box, the S3 API for object storage. It does not have versioning, Object Lock or public buckets; if you need those, a larger object-storage provider is the better fit.

Or Both

The usual rule for data that matters is three copies, on two kinds of storage, one off-site. A nightly Borg or restic backup to a storage box plus a weekly copy to object storage covers it, and neither provider becomes a single point of failure. The Borg guide sets up the first half. For the second copy, pick a different provider or region from the first. Our storage boxes and our object storage are in the same data centre, so using both of ours gives you two kinds of storage but not two places.

Common Questions

  • Which is cheaper?

    For a known amount of data that you back up regularly and restore occasionally, a flat-priced storage box is usually cheaper and always more predictable. Object storage bills storage by the gigabyte plus, on most providers, downloads and requests — so it looks cheaper per gigabyte and can cost more the day you actually need your data back.

  • Can restic or rclone use either?

    Yes. Both support SFTP and S3-compatible storage, so the choice is about price, features and where the data sits rather than about the tool.

  • Is a storage box a backup of itself?

    It is usually where your backups go rather than something that is backed up again. Ours sits on mirrored drives, which covers a failed drive; like most storage services it is one location, so for anything irreplaceable keep one more copy somewhere else.

We sell both: flat-priced storage boxes over SSH, and S3-compatible object storage — both from 1 TB with transfer included.

See storage boxes

Keep Reading

All guides
Storage Box vs Object Storage (S3) | Virteche Cloud